Sample Walkthrough: Recognizing Patterns Before Structure
This is a high-level walkthrough of how a pattern engine might begin to operate before any formal database or graph structure is in place.
Step 1: Initial Observation
A child sees a brown, four-legged animal with a wagging tail.
Pattern Noticed
- Shape: 4 legs, small head, moving tail
- Color: brown
- Motion: wagging tail
- Sound: bark
These are captured as raw patterns.
Step 2: Label Association
Someone points and says: “Dog.”
Result
- The system labels the observed pattern as
Dog
.
Now a soft association begins to form between the multi-sensory pattern and the word.
Step 3: Reinforcement
Over time, the child sees other animals with similar patterns and hears the word “Dog” again.
Reinforced Pattern
- Pattern group:
{4 legs + wagging tail + bark}
→ likelyDog
Step 4: Rule Formation (Implicit)
The system now begins to form generalizations like:
- “Dog” usually has 4 legs.
- “Dog” may bark.
- “Dog” is not a cat (difference pattern emerging).
These aren’t rules in logic—they’re accumulated probability-weighted patterns.
Step 5: Anomaly or Correction
One day the child sees a statue of a dog.
System Reaction
- Visually matches “Dog” pattern
- No sound, no movement
Possible outcomes:
- Adjust pattern confidence: Not all “Dogs” move or bark.
- Add new sub-pattern: “Some dogs are not alive.”
Step 6: Conflict
The child is bitten by a dog.
New pattern:
Dog
→Pain
This introduces a new pattern link:
Dog
may beDangerous
But this conflicts with:
Dog
→Friendly
The system now starts to track contradictory patterns and context (e.g., not all dogs are dangerous).
What This Walkthrough Shows
- The system accumulates pattern links, not hard truths.
- Associations are formed from input and feedback.
- Contradictions are handled by splitting contexts or lowering confidence.
- No graph structure is needed yet—just recursive pattern registration and comparison.
Next: Explore the Schema to see how this is formalized in a Graph and KeyPair database.